Salvatore Caruso vs Elliot Benchetrit — Perugia CH Round of 32

Perugia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
clay
MAR
Elliot Benchetrit
#1360ATP
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Caruso S.
7-6 6-3
Benchetrit E.
Caruso S.
7762
Benchetrit E.
6330

Salvatore Caruso defeated Elliot Benchetrit 7-6 6-3 in the Perugia CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Benchetrit E.

Benchetrit E.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Benchetrit E.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Caruso S.Benchetrit E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
65
59
Break points won·Clear edge
30
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Caruso S.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Benchetrit E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
3.5
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Munar J.[2]
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-34-66-1
Semi-finals
Etcheverry T.[3]
Marterer M.
6-17-64
Munar J.[2]
Darderi L.
7-53-67-65
Quarter-finals
Munar J.[2]
Monteiro T.[5]
6-757-57-61
Darderi L.
Potenza L.
6-06-1
Etcheverry T.[3]
Coric B.
6-46-3
Marterer M.
Zeppieri G.
6-43-66-3
R16
Potenza L.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-12-1
Monteiro T.[5]
Caruso S.
4-66-46-3
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-26-756-3
Marterer M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-33-66-3
Darderi L.
Nardi L.
6-746-46-2
Coric B.
Giannessi A.
6-27-66
Munar J.[2]
Passaro F.
7-646-4
Zeppieri G.
Rodriguez C.
6-27-5
R32
Giannessi A.
Fatic N.
7-50-0
Zeppieri G.
Galan D.[6]
6-747-56-3
Monteiro T.[5]
Tabacco G.
6-26-1
Darderi L.
Elias G.
6-36-2
Coric B.
Varillas J.[8]
6-36-2
Etcheverry T.[3]
Cecchinato M.
2-67-646-3
Marterer M.
Taberner C.[1]
7-646-3
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Agamenone F.
6-43-66-4
Potenza L.
Ymer E.
6-43-66-4
Rodriguez C.
Gigante M.
6-36-2
Cobolli F.
Skatov T.
7-646-3
Nardi L.
Mager G.[7]
7-656-726-4
Caruso S.
Benchetrit E.
7-636-3
Munar J.[2]
Arnaldi M.
6-27-5
Passaro F.
Oradini G.
6-42-66-4
Arnaboldi A.
Baldi F.
7-53-1