Tim Van Rijthoven vs Felix Auger Aliassime — s Hertogenbosch Semi-final

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Semi-final
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 June 2022
grass
Felix Auger Aliassime
CAN1
Felix Auger Aliassime
#4ATP
1958ELO
1789Grass ELO
$2.1MYTD
$23MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWLW
Van Rijthoven T.
6-3 1-6 7-6
Auger Aliassime F.
Van Rijthoven T.
61772
Auger Aliassime F.
36651

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Felix Auger Aliassime 6-3 1-6 7-6 in the s Hertogenbosch semi-final on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Auger Aliassime F.

Auger Aliassime F.serving96% hold

wins 77% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Auger Aliassime F.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
69%
68%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
11.0
9.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (71 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Auger Aliassime F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
84
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
100
Break points won·Dominant
1
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
19
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Rijthoven T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Auger Aliassime F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
8.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Rijthoven T.Auger Aliassime F.
Freshness·
—
70

Auger Aliassime F.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Van Rijthoven T.
Medvedev D.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Van Rijthoven T.
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
6-31-67-65
Medvedev D.[3]
Mannarino A.
7-57-5
Quarter-finals
Mannarino A.
Nakashima B.
6-756-16-4
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaston H.
7-626-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Ivashka I.
7-686-4
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Khachanov K.[5]
7-656-4
R16
Nakashima B.
Querrey S.
7-647-66
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-2
Gaston H.
Brooksby J.[8]
3-66-37-5
Auger Aliassime F.[1]
Griekspoor T.[6]
7-627-65
Khachanov K.[5]
Majchrzak K.
5-77-57-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Fritz T.[3]
6-797-56-4
Mannarino A.
De Minaur A.[2]
6-26-3
Medvedev D.[3]
Simon G.
7-56-4
R32
Brooksby J.[8]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Van Rijthoven T.
Ebden M.
7-647-69
Mannarino A.
Seppi A.
7-647-69
Griekspoor T.[6]
Bedene A.
7-57-5
Querrey S.
Haase R.
6-36-2
Gaston H.
Kwon S.
6-26-1
Nakashima B.
Paul T.[7]
6-747-657-62
Majchrzak K.
Koepfer D.
6-16-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Van De Zandschulp B.[6]
4-66-26-1
Simon G.
Duckworth J.
6-47-69
Khachanov K.[5]
Tabilo A.
6-36-3
Ivashka I.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-786-1