Chun Hsin Tseng vs Aldin Setkic — Poznan CH Round of 16

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE4
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
clay
BIH
Aldin Setkic
#1327ATP
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
Tseng C.
7-5 7-6
Setkic A.
Tseng C.
7792
Setkic A.
5670

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Aldin Setkic 7-5 7-6 in the Poznan CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Setkic A.

Setkic A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Serve advantage — Tseng C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Setkic A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 58). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Setkic A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
0
Break points saved·Dominant
83
54
Break points won·Slight edge
15
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
31
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Setkic A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kuzmanov D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-53-67-66
Olivieri G.
Shevchenko A.
6-43-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
Tseng C.[4]
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-617-5
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Grenier H.[7]
6-26-1
Shevchenko A.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-26-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
W/O
Olivieri G.
Barrere G.
4-66-47-60
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kravchenko G.
6-766-36-3
Tseng C.[4]
Setkic A.
7-57-67
Bergs Z.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ejupovic E.
6-27-5
R32
Barrere G.
Guinard M.[6]
4-62-1
Shevchenko A.
Balazs A.
6-36-3
Bergs Z.
Mena F.
6-46-2
Grenier H.[7]
Popko D.
6-42-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
5-76-46-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Olivo R.
6-27-66
Kravchenko G.
Michalski D.
7-56-2
Ejupovic E.
Janowicz J.
7-666-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-22-66-3
Laaksonen H.[2]
Milojevic N.
1-66-26-3
Rinderknech A.[1]
Giustino L.
6-46-0
Setkic A.
Borg L.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Krutykh O.
6-27-5
Galan D.[3]
Basic M.
6-736-36-1
Olivieri G.
Lama G.
7-57-5
Tseng C.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-11-0