Max Purcell vs Sam Querrey — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
USA
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Purcell M.
6-4 7-6
Querrey S.
Purcell M.
6772
Querrey S.
4650

Max Purcell defeated Sam Querrey 6-4 7-6 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Querrey S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Querrey S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
44%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
31%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
12.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Querrey S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
49
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Even
10
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Querrey S.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2