Jordan Thompson vs Christopher Oconnell — Surbiton CH Quarter-final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS8
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1709Grass ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1614Grass ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Thompson J.
6-2 6-3
Oconnell C.
Thompson J.
662
Oconnell C.
230

Jordan Thompson defeated Christopher Oconnell 6-2 6-3 in the Surbiton CH quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-03MelbourneR32hardJordan Thompson1-6 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Oconnell C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Oconnell C.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Even
7.2
7.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Oconnell C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
49
Break points saved·Even
97
98
Break points won·Even
24
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
38
Tiebreaks·Even
95
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Oconnell C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
7.2+95 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Grass Elo 1614
6.4Overall Elo 1772
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1673
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.9
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2