Ryan Peniston vs Adrian Mannarino — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1440Grass ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
Adrian Mannarino
FRA2
Adrian Mannarino
#49ATP
1673ELO
1653Grass ELO
$633kYTD
$15MCAREER
38 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWW
Peniston R.
2-6 6-1 6-4
Mannarino A.
Peniston R.
2662
Mannarino A.
6141

Ryan Peniston defeated Adrian Mannarino 2-6 6-1 6-4 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Adrian Mannarino came in ranked #49.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mannarino A.

Mannarino A.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Serve advantage — Peniston R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Mannarino A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (188 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Mannarino A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
65
Break points saved·Dominant
60
96
Break points won·Dominant
25
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
72
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Mannarino A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
2.3Grass Elo 1440
Surface ELO
7.7+213 Grass Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1441
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1673
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Peniston R.Mannarino A.
Freshness·
—
80

Mannarino A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 46 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2