Denis Kudla vs Max Purcell — Surbiton CH Quarter-final

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA7
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Kudla D.
6-4 7-6
Purcell M.
Kudla D.
6772
Purcell M.
4640

Denis Kudla defeated Max Purcell 6-4 7-6 in the Surbiton CH quarter-final on grass. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-23Winston-SalemQ2hardDenis Kudla6-4 5-7 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
7.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
50
59
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Slight edge
19
10
Deciding sets·Even
81
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Purcell M.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2