Brandon Nakashima vs Stefan Kozlov — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Brandon Nakashima
USA5
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1757Grass ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
Stefan Kozlov
USA
Stefan Kozlov
#296ATP
1429ELO
1414Grass ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
Nakashima B.
6-4 6-3
Kozlov S.
Nakashima B.
662
Kozlov S.
430

Brandon Nakashima defeated Stefan Kozlov 6-4 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Kozlov S.

Kozlov S.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Kozlov S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.2
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Kozlov S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
36
Break points saved·Dominant
99
49
Break points won·Slight edge
13
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
89
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kozlov S.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.9+342 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.1Grass Elo 1414
9.8Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
0.2Overall Elo 1429
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 7
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Kozlov S.
Freshness·Clear edge
90
69

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kozlov S.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2