Otto Virtanen vs Paul Jubb — Surbiton CH Round of 16

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Otto Virtanen
FIN
Otto Virtanen
#126ATP
1706ELO
1688Grass ELO
$214kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1445Grass ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Virtanen O.
2-6 7-5 6-3
Jubb P.
Virtanen O.
2762
Jubb P.
6531

Otto Virtanen defeated Paul Jubb 2-6 7-5 6-3 in the Surbiton CH round of 16 on grass. The result followed the form book — Otto Virtanen came in ranked #126.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Virtanen O.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Virtanen O.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Virtanen O.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.7
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Virtanen O.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
48
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
84
Break points won·Even
3
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
57
44
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
85
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Virtanen O.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Jubb P.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.1+243 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Grass Elo 1445
8.6Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1426
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Virtanen O.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
100

Virtanen O.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2