Paul Jubb vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1445Grass ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1510Grass ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Jubb P.
6-4 7-6
Kukushkin M.
Jubb P.
67112
Kukushkin M.
4690

Paul Jubb defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 6-4 7-6 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
1.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jubb P.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
38
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
93
Break points won·Dominant
6
41
Deciding sets·Even
44
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Kukushkin M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
3.8Grass Elo 1445
Surface ELO
6.2+65 Grass Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1426
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1552
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Kukushkin M.
Freshness·
100
—

Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2