Brandon Nakashima vs Marc Andrea Huesler — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Brandon Nakashima
USA5
Brandon Nakashima
#32ATP
1839ELO
1757Grass ELO
$990kYTD
$7.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
Marc Andrea Huesler
SUI
Marc Andrea Huesler
#307ATP
1504ELO
1457Grass ELO
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
Nakashima B.
4-6 7-6 6-2
Huesler M.
Nakashima B.
471262
Huesler M.
661021

Brandon Nakashima defeated Marc Andrea Huesler 4-6 7-6 6-2 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Brandon Nakashima came in ranked #32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakashima B.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Huesler M.

Huesler M.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Nakashima B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakashima B.Huesler M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
68%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
66%
65%
Aces / match·Even
8.5
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.2
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nakashima B.Huesler M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
29
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Slight edge
13
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
64
13
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
89
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakashima B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Huesler M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
8.2+300 Grass Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.8Grass Elo 1457
8.7Overall Elo 1839
ELO gap
1.3Overall Elo 1504
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
3.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nakashima B.Huesler M.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
79

Nakashima B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Huesler M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 42 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2