Jason Kubler vs Brandon Holt — Little Rock CH Quarter-final

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS4
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Kubler J.
7-6 6-3
Holt B.
Kubler J.
7762
Holt B.
6530

Jason Kubler defeated Brandon Holt 7-6 6-3 in the Little Rock CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Holt B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Even
59
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
85
Break points won·Clear edge
46
31
Deciding sets·Even
79
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Holt B.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
6.6+128 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1507
6.8Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
3.2Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
4.0
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Wu T.[8]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[4]
Shelton B.
6-46-4
Wu T.[8]
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Kubler J.[4]
Holt B.
7-656-3
Wu T.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-1
Kovacevic A.
Cassone M.
7-656-1
R16
Shelton B.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Jaziri M.
4-67-656-4
Kubler J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Wu T.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[3]
1-67-636-3
Cassone M.
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.
Blanch U.
6-44-66-3
Holt B.
Hijikata R.[7]
6-23-66-2
R32
Cassone M.
Mmoh M.[5]
2-66-36-2
Shelton B.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Kubler J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-17-64
Holt B.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[7]
Yevseyev D.
6-736-46-3
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.
6-36-736-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-36-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Moriya H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-696-2
Jaziri M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-26-4
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
4-66-36-1
Kovacevic A.
Wolf J.[1]
6-25-76-4
Gomez E.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Young D.
6-36-746-2