Mark Whitehouse vs Antoine Hoang — Surbiton CH Qualifying Round 2

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GBR
Mark Whitehouse
#1577ATP
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
FRA6
Antoine Hoang
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Whitehouse M.
6-7 7-6 7-6
Hoang A.
Whitehouse M.
6577772
Hoang A.
7765641

Mark Whitehouse defeated Antoine Hoang 6-7 7-6 7-6 in the Surbiton CH qualifying round 2 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Whitehouse M.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Hoang A.

Hoang A.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Whitehouse M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Whitehouse M.Hoang A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (34 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Whitehouse M.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 350 days (−1.5)
Hoang A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Brouwer G.[5]
Mchugh A.[10]
6-36-756-3
Virtanen O.
Copil M.[7]
6-46-1
Herbert P.[2]
Bellier A.[9]
6-27-5
Whitehouse M.
Hoang A.[6]
6-757-657-64
Purcell M.[1]
Jung J.[8]
4-66-46-4
Harris B.[11]
Ramanathan R.[3]
6-44-66-4
Q1
Virtanen O.
Van Rijthoven T.[4]
6-33-67-5
Hoang A.[6]
Hussey G.
7-616-4
Mchugh A.[10]
Broom C.
7-634-66-4
Herbert P.[2]
Cash J.
6-26-766-3
Bellier A.[9]
Little D.
6-36-1
Purcell M.[1]
Samuel T.
6-47-5
Brouwer G.[5]
Wendelken H.
6-46-3
Whitehouse M.
Rosenkranz M.[12]
6-36-4
Copil M.[7]
Weightman O.
6-36-4
Harris B.[11]
Jansen W.
7-56-3
Ramanathan R.[3]
Paris J.
6-36-2
Jung J.[8]
Nedovyesov A.
6-16-3