Brandon Holt vs Andrew Harris — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
hard
AUS
Andrew Harris
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWL
Holt B.
6-1 6-4
Harris A.
Holt B.
662
Harris A.
140

Brandon Holt defeated Andrew Harris 6-1 6-4 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Harris A.

Harris A.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Harris A.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
3.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Harris A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
28
Break points saved·Dominant
85
44
Break points won·Clear edge
31
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
62
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
69
52

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Harris A.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Wu T.[8]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[4]
Shelton B.
6-46-4
Wu T.[8]
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Kubler J.[4]
Holt B.
7-656-3
Wu T.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-1
Kovacevic A.
Cassone M.
7-656-1
R16
Shelton B.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Jaziri M.
4-67-656-4
Kubler J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Wu T.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[3]
1-67-636-3
Cassone M.
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.
Blanch U.
6-44-66-3
Holt B.
Hijikata R.[7]
6-23-66-2
R32
Cassone M.
Mmoh M.[5]
2-66-36-2
Shelton B.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Kubler J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-17-64
Holt B.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[7]
Yevseyev D.
6-736-46-3
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.
6-36-736-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-36-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Moriya H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-696-2
Jaziri M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-26-4
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
4-66-36-1
Kovacevic A.
Wolf J.[1]
6-25-76-4
Gomez E.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Young D.
6-36-746-2