Emilio Gomez vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU2
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
hard
ESP
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Gomez E.
6-1 6-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Gomez E.
662
Menendez Maceiras A.
120

Emilio Gomez defeated Adrian Menendez Maceiras 6-1 6-2 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Menendez Maceiras A.

Menendez Maceiras A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Menendez Maceiras A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
53%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 38). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Menendez Maceiras A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
77
54
Break points won·Clear edge
19
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
23
32
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
79
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Menendez Maceiras A.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
6.1
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Wu T.[8]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[4]
Shelton B.
6-46-4
Wu T.[8]
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Kubler J.[4]
Holt B.
7-656-3
Wu T.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-1
Kovacevic A.
Cassone M.
7-656-1
R16
Shelton B.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Jaziri M.
4-67-656-4
Kubler J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Wu T.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[3]
1-67-636-3
Cassone M.
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.
Blanch U.
6-44-66-3
Holt B.
Hijikata R.[7]
6-23-66-2
R32
Cassone M.
Mmoh M.[5]
2-66-36-2
Shelton B.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Kubler J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-17-64
Holt B.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[7]
Yevseyev D.
6-736-46-3
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.
6-36-736-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-36-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Moriya H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-696-2
Jaziri M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-26-4
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
4-66-36-1
Kovacevic A.
Wolf J.[1]
6-25-76-4
Gomez E.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Young D.
6-36-746-2