Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Christopher Eubanks — Little Rock CH Round of 16

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
hard
USA3
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Uchiyama Y.
1-6 7-6 6-3
Eubanks C.
Uchiyama Y.
17762
Eubanks C.
66331

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Christopher Eubanks 1-6 7-6 6-3 in the Little Rock CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.9
10.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
50
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
96
Break points won·Even
2
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
45
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Uchiyama Y.
3.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Eubanks C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Hard Elo 1431
Surface ELO
5.5+62 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1523
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
3-set count
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Wu T.[8]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[4]
Shelton B.
6-46-4
Wu T.[8]
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Kubler J.[4]
Holt B.
7-656-3
Wu T.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-1
Kovacevic A.
Cassone M.
7-656-1
R16
Shelton B.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Jaziri M.
4-67-656-4
Kubler J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Wu T.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[3]
1-67-636-3
Cassone M.
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.
Blanch U.
6-44-66-3
Holt B.
Hijikata R.[7]
6-23-66-2
R32
Cassone M.
Mmoh M.[5]
2-66-36-2
Shelton B.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Kubler J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-17-64
Holt B.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[7]
Yevseyev D.
6-736-46-3
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.
6-36-736-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-36-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Moriya H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-696-2
Jaziri M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-26-4
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
4-66-36-1
Kovacevic A.
Wolf J.[1]
6-25-76-4
Gomez E.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Young D.
6-36-746-2