Elmar Ejupovic vs Jerzy Janowicz — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
clay
POL
Jerzy Janowicz
35 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Ejupovic E.
7-6 6-1
Janowicz J.
Ejupovic E.
7862
Janowicz J.
6610

Elmar Ejupovic defeated Jerzy Janowicz 7-6 6-1 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Elmar Ejupovic came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Elmar Ejupovic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ejupovic E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Janowicz J.

Janowicz J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ejupovic E.Janowicz J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
71%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
8.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ejupovic E.Janowicz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
7
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
93
Break points won·Slight edge
1
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
0
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ejupovic E.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Janowicz J.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kuzmanov D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-53-67-66
Olivieri G.
Shevchenko A.
6-43-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
Tseng C.[4]
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-617-5
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Grenier H.[7]
6-26-1
Shevchenko A.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-26-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
W/O
Olivieri G.
Barrere G.
4-66-47-60
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kravchenko G.
6-766-36-3
Tseng C.[4]
Setkic A.
7-57-67
Bergs Z.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ejupovic E.
6-27-5
R32
Barrere G.
Guinard M.[6]
4-62-1
Shevchenko A.
Balazs A.
6-36-3
Bergs Z.
Mena F.
6-46-2
Grenier H.[7]
Popko D.
6-42-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
5-76-46-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Olivo R.
6-27-66
Kravchenko G.
Michalski D.
7-56-2
Ejupovic E.
Janowicz J.
7-666-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-22-66-3
Laaksonen H.[2]
Milojevic N.
1-66-26-3
Rinderknech A.[1]
Giustino L.
6-46-0
Setkic A.
Borg L.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Krutykh O.
6-27-5
Galan D.[3]
Basic M.
6-736-36-1
Olivieri G.
Lama G.
7-57-5
Tseng C.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-11-0