Ulises Blanch vs Roberto Quiroz — Little Rock CH Round of 32

Little Rock CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
hard
ECU
Roberto Quiroz
34 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
Blanch U.
6-4 7-6
Quiroz R.
Blanch U.
6772
Quiroz R.
4650

Ulises Blanch defeated Roberto Quiroz 6-4 7-6 in the Little Rock CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Quiroz R.

Quiroz R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Quiroz R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
55%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Quiroz R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
19
14
Break points saved·Even
83
80
Break points won·Slight edge
2
7
Deciding sets·Even
19
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
37
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanch U.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Quiroz R.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.7
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.[4]
Wu T.[8]
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[4]
Shelton B.
6-46-4
Wu T.[8]
Kovacevic A.
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Shelton B.
Burruchaga R.
7-56-1
Kubler J.[4]
Holt B.
7-656-3
Wu T.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-1
Kovacevic A.
Cassone M.
7-656-1
R16
Shelton B.
Gomez E.[2]
6-46-4
Burruchaga R.
Jaziri M.
4-67-656-4
Kubler J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Wu T.[8]
Mejia N.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Eubanks C.[3]
1-67-636-3
Cassone M.
Uchida K.
6-46-3
Kovacevic A.
Blanch U.
6-44-66-3
Holt B.
Hijikata R.[7]
6-23-66-2
R32
Cassone M.
Mmoh M.[5]
2-66-36-2
Shelton B.
Harrison C.
7-646-4
Kubler J.[4]
Villanueva G.
6-17-64
Holt B.
Harris A.
6-16-4
Hijikata R.[7]
Yevseyev D.
6-736-46-3
Mejia N.
Svajda Z.
6-36-736-3
Eubanks C.[3]
Kirkin E.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-36-4
Blanch U.
Quiroz R.
6-47-65
Moriya H.
Soares Klier Junior G.
7-696-2
Jaziri M.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-26-4
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Fanselow S.
4-66-36-1
Kovacevic A.
Wolf J.[1]
6-25-76-4
Gomez E.[2]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-2
Burruchaga R.
Young D.
6-36-746-2