Zizou Bergs vs Facundo Mena — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Bergs Z.
6-4 6-2
Mena F.
Bergs Z.
662
Mena F.
420

Zizou Bergs defeated Facundo Mena 6-4 6-2 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
9
Break points saved·Dominant
95
57
Break points won·Clear edge
21
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Mena F.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.7+291 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.3Clay Elo 1406
9.6Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
0.4Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
9.1
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Mena F.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
70

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rinderknech A.[1]
Barrios Vera T.[5]
6-37-62
Semi-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kuzmanov D.
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-53-67-66
Olivieri G.
Shevchenko A.
6-43-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
Tseng C.[4]
6-46-2
Rinderknech A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
7-617-5
R16
Kuzmanov D.
Grenier H.[7]
6-26-1
Shevchenko A.
Laaksonen H.[2]
6-26-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
W/O
Olivieri G.
Barrere G.
4-66-47-60
Rinderknech A.[1]
Kravchenko G.
6-766-36-3
Tseng C.[4]
Setkic A.
7-57-67
Bergs Z.
Galan D.[3]
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Ejupovic E.
6-27-5
R32
Barrere G.
Guinard M.[6]
4-62-1
Shevchenko A.
Balazs A.
6-36-3
Bergs Z.
Mena F.
6-46-2
Grenier H.[7]
Popko D.
6-42-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.[8]
Kasnikowski M.
5-76-46-1
Dutra Da Silva D.
Olivo R.
6-27-66
Kravchenko G.
Michalski D.
7-56-2
Ejupovic E.
Janowicz J.
7-666-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Arnaboldi A.
6-22-66-3
Laaksonen H.[2]
Milojevic N.
1-66-26-3
Rinderknech A.[1]
Giustino L.
6-46-0
Setkic A.
Borg L.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Krutykh O.
6-27-5
Galan D.[3]
Basic M.
6-736-36-1
Olivieri G.
Lama G.
7-57-5
Tseng C.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-11-0