Gijs Brouwer vs Radu Albot — Surbiton CH Round of 32

Surbiton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gijs Brouwer
NED
Gijs Brouwer
#1115ATP
30 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 May 2022
grass
Radu Albot
MDA
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1495Grass ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Brouwer G.
6-4 6-4
Albot R.
Brouwer G.
662
Albot R.
440

Gijs Brouwer defeated Radu Albot 6-4 6-4 in the Surbiton CH round of 32 on grass.

Key context

  • Match story: Gijs Brouwer edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brouwer G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Brouwer G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brouwer G.Albot R.
1st serve in·Even
67%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
2.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brouwer G.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
19
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
85
Break points won·Clear edge
6
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brouwer G.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Albot R.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Minutes 14d
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
3.0
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brouwer G.Albot R.
Freshness·Even
92
93

Brouwer G.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[8]
Kudla D.[7]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Virtanen O.
6-31-66-4
Kudla D.[7]
Murray A.[1]
5-77-646-3
Quarter-finals
Virtanen O.
Peniston R.
6-716-37-66
Murray A.[1]
Nakashima B.[5]
6-47-61
Kudla D.[7]
Purcell M.
6-47-64
Thompson J.[8]
Oconnell C.
6-26-3
R16
Kudla D.[7]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Kozlov S.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-56-3
Virtanen O.
Jubb P.
2-67-56-3
Purcell M.
Herbert P.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Gray A.
6-37-65
Peniston R.
Draper J.
6-797-56-4
Murray A.[1]
Brouwer G.
7-647-63
R32
Ramanathan R.
Sugita Y.
4-67-57-62
Purcell M.
Querrey S.
6-47-65
Thompson J.[8]
Copil M.
6-36-4
Murray A.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-26-1
Brouwer G.
Albot R.
6-46-4
Kozlov S.
Moraing M.
6-37-64
Virtanen O.
Kokkinakis T.[9]
6-37-65
Kudla D.[7]
Popyrin A.
7-53-66-3
Oconnell C.
Kwon S.[3]
4-66-46-3
Peniston R.
Mannarino A.[2]
2-66-16-4
Draper J.
Harris B.
6-26-2
Jubb P.
Kukushkin M.
6-47-69
Gray A.
Whitehouse M.
6-36-2
Broady L.
Clarke J.
4-66-36-2
Herbert P.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-756-16-3
Nakashima B.[5]
Huesler M.
4-67-6106-2