Oleksii Krutykh vs Hazem Naw — Troisdorf CH Qualifying Round 1

Troisdorf CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
UKR1
Oleksii Krutykh
#559ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 May 2022
clay
SYR
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Krutykh O.
6-1 6-0
Naw H.
Krutykh O.
662
Naw H.
100

Oleksii Krutykh defeated Hazem Naw 6-1 6-0 in the Troisdorf CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krutykh O.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Naw H.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Krutykh O.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krutykh O.Naw H.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.5
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (173 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krutykh O.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Naw H.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 808 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Mochizuki S.[8]
Krutykh O.[1]
6-37-5
Gerch L.[5]
Fils A.[10]
7-656-3
Chepelev A.[11]
Harris B.[6]
7-56-4
Klein L.[2]
Habib H.[9]
6-16-3
Bertola R.
Jaziri M.[4]
4-66-06-3
Setkic A.[7]
Wessels L.[3]
6-46-4
Q1
Krutykh O.[1]
Naw H.
6-16-0
Bertola R.
Blanchet U.[12]
3-66-46-4
Setkic A.[7]
Sandkaulen T.
6-36-2
Mochizuki S.[8]
Moraing O.
6-06-3
Jaziri M.[4]
Jahn J.
2-66-36-4
Chepelev A.[11]
Mccabe J.
6-37-65
Harris B.[6]
Schell N.
7-56-3
Fils A.[10]
Uzhylovsky V.
6-15-2
Gerch L.[5]
Loosen T.
6-16-1
Wessels L.[3]
King E.
6-26-776-1
Habib H.[9]
Sperle J.
7-647-5
Klein L.[2]
Cias P.
6-46-736-1