Bernarda Pera vs Elena Gabriela Ruse — Strasbourg Round of 32

Strasbourg · WTA · Round of 32
Bernarda Pera
USA
Bernarda Pera
#773WTA
1653ELO
1640Clay ELO
31 yrs · 175 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Elena Gabriela Ruse
ROU
Elena Gabriela Ruse
#72WTA
1850ELO
1744Clay ELO
28 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
Pera B.
7-5 6-4
Ruse E.
Pera B.
762
Ruse E.
540

Bernarda Pera defeated Elena Gabriela Ruse 7-5 6-4 in the Strasbourg round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Elena Gabriela Ruse came in ranked #72. Bernarda Pera extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-07-18HamburgR32clayBernarda Pera6-0 6-4
2018-04-30PragueR32clayElena Gabriela Ruse2-6 6-1 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Pera B.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ruse E.

Ruse E.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pera B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pera B.Ruse E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
46%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
4.8
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (192 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pera B.Ruse E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
56
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
72
Break points won·Clear edge
79
98
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pera B.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Ruse E.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Clay Elo 1640
Surface ELO
6.3+104 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1653
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1850
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Pera B.Ruse E.
Freshness·
—
98

Ruse E.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kerber A.[2]
Juvan K.
7-656-707-65
Semi-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Dodin O.
7-621-0
Juvan K.
Pliskova K.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Linette M.[8]
6-24-66-4
Dodin O.
Golubic V.[9]
6-36-0
Juvan K.
Mertens E.[4]
7-636-4
Pliskova K.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-47-66
R16
Golubic V.[9]
Ferro F.
6-46-2
Dodin O.
Makarova E.
6-26-1
Linette M.[8]
Watson H.
6-16-1
Mertens E.[4]
Friedsam A.
7-57-5
Pliskova K.[1]
Pera B.
6-31-66-1
Juvan K.
Berberovic N.
6-26-3
Zanevska M.
Tan H.
4-67-56-1
Kerber A.[2]
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-4
R32
Juvan K.
Glushko L.
6-36-1
Zanevska M.
Zhang S.[5]
6-26-3
Pliskova K.[1]
Kostyuk M.
6-46-2
Makarova E.
Cirstea S.[3]
1-66-36-2
Dodin O.
Konjuh A.
6-21-67-5
Pera B.
Ruse E.
7-56-4
Friedsam A.
Saville D.
4-66-37-65
Golubic V.[9]
Morderger Y.
6-06-4
Ferro F.
Gabueva A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[4]
Monnet C.
7-56-4
Linette M.[8]
Gracheva V.
6-36-0
Watson H.
Hobgarski K.
6-46-1
Tan H.
Stosur S.
6-26-1
Berberovic N.
Stephens S.[6]
2-66-46-1
Sasnovich A.
Gervais J.
6-46-2
Kerber A.[2]
Parry D.
6-36-4