Filip Misolic vs Lucas Miedler — Tunis CH Round of 32

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
AUT
Lucas Miedler
#1536ATP
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLL
Misolic F.
6-2 3-6 6-1
Miedler L.
Misolic F.
6362
Miedler L.
2611

Filip Misolic defeated Lucas Miedler 6-2 3-6 6-1 in the Tunis CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Miedler L.

Miedler L.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Miedler L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Miedler L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
78
Break points won·Dominant
53
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Miedler L.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.7
Surface form
7.1
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
4.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Brouwer G.
Misolic F.
6-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zhang Z.[7]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
7-56-3
Misolic F.
Kuhn N.[6]
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Geerts M.
7-56-1
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-16-1
Geerts M.
Sels J.[5]
6-14-66-3
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-37-66
Roca Batalla O.
Erler A.
7-57-62
Misolic F.
Thompson J.[1]
6-757-676-1
Brouwer G.
Janvier M.
6-47-62
Kuhn N.[6]
Michalski D.
6-27-61
Zhang Z.[7]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-37-5
R32
Erler A.
Coppejans K.[8]
7-657-61
Roca Batalla O.
Gill F.
6-16-4
Zhang Z.[7]
Bemelmans R.
6-36-1
Brouwer G.
Setkic A.
7-636-3
Janvier M.
Barranco Cosano J.[3]
6-47-5
Kuhn N.[6]
Hemery C.
6-46-1
Michalski D.
Krstin P.
6-46-0
Thompson J.[1]
Bertola R.
6-16-4
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-756-06-1
Misolic F.
Miedler L.
6-23-66-1
Esteve Lobato E.
Echargui M.
6-17-5
Geerts M.
Ouakaa A.
2-66-46-1
Sels J.[5]
Jaziri M.
4-66-26-1
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
Mansouri S.
6-46-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Vatutin A.
6-32-67-5