Martina Trevisan vs Claire Liu — Rabat Final

Rabat · WTA · Final
Martina Trevisan
ITA
Martina Trevisan
#405WTA
1462ELO
1450Clay ELO
32 yrs · 160 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Claire Liu
USA
Claire Liu
#111WTA
1669ELO
1623Clay ELO
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWWWWL
Trevisan M.
6-2 6-1
Liu C.
Trevisan M.
662
Liu C.
210

Martina Trevisan defeated Claire Liu 6-2 6-1 in the Rabat final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Claire Liu came in ranked #111. Martina Trevisan extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-03-20MiamiR32hardMartina Trevisan4-6 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Trevisan M.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Liu C.

Liu C.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Trevisan M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trevisan M.Liu C.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
45%
Service points won·Even
54%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
54%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.9
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (177 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trevisan M.Liu C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
61
Break points saved·Clear edge
51
64
Break points won·Clear edge
90
78
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
79
Tiebreaks·Even
71
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trevisan M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Liu C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.4Clay Elo 1450
Surface ELO
5.6+173 Clay Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1462
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1669
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
5.7
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trevisan M.Liu C.
Freshness·
—
71

Liu C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 66%

Draw

Final
Trevisan M.
Liu C.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Liu C.
Bondar A.[5]
W/O
Trevisan M.
Bronzetti L.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bondar A.[5]
Tomljanovic A.[2]
5-1
Bronzetti L.
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
6-13-67-65
Liu C.
Sharma A.
6-46-1
Trevisan M.
Rus A.[7]
7-646-3
R16
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Schmiedlova A.
7-56-2
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Mladenovic K.
4-66-36-0
Rus A.[7]
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Marcinko P.
5-76-36-3
Liu C.
Sherif M.[4]
4-67-656-1
Trevisan M.
Muguruza G.[1]
2-66-46-1
Bronzetti L.
Burel C.
6-36-2
Bondar A.[5]
Kucova K.
6-36-3
R32
Mladenovic K.
Andrianjafitrimo T.
6-33-67-67
Kucova K.
Harrison C.
6-26-0
Marcinko P.
Peterson R.[9]
6-02-67-5
Burel C.
Udvardy P.
7-647-63
Sharma A.
Zacarias M.
1-67-56-4
Muguruza G.[1]
Danilina A.
6-36-2
Schmiedlova A.
Reyngold E.
6-16-2
Rus A.[7]
Sun L.
6-36-0
Bronzetti L.
Kalinskaya A.[8]
6-36-756-3
Liu C.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-3
Trevisan M.
You X.
6-06-4
Galfi D.
Eikeri U.
6-27-5
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Zhao C.
7-641-66-2
Sherif M.[4]
Paquet C.
6-06-2
Bondar A.[5]
Ferrando C.
6-43-67-5
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1