Filip Misolic vs Nicola Kuhn — Tunis CH Quarter-final

Tunis CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
GER6
Nicola Kuhn
#1540ATP
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
Misolic F.
6-3 6-4
Kuhn N.
Misolic F.
662
Kuhn N.
340

Filip Misolic defeated Nicola Kuhn 6-3 6-4 in the Tunis CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kuhn N.

Kuhn N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Kuhn N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Kuhn N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
14
Break points saved·Dominant
91
56
Break points won·Dominant
53
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kuhn N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.7
Surface form
3.4
9.07-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
8.8
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Brouwer G.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Brouwer G.
Misolic F.
6-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Zhang Z.[7]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Zhang Z.[7]
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
7-56-3
Misolic F.
Kuhn N.[6]
6-36-4
Brouwer G.
Roca Batalla O.
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Geerts M.
7-56-1
R16
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Esteve Lobato E.
6-16-1
Geerts M.
Sels J.[5]
6-14-66-3
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
Sanchez Jover C.
6-37-66
Roca Batalla O.
Erler A.
7-57-62
Misolic F.
Thompson J.[1]
6-757-676-1
Brouwer G.
Janvier M.
6-47-62
Kuhn N.[6]
Michalski D.
6-27-61
Zhang Z.[7]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-37-5
R32
Erler A.
Coppejans K.[8]
7-657-61
Roca Batalla O.
Gill F.
6-16-4
Zhang Z.[7]
Bemelmans R.
6-36-1
Brouwer G.
Setkic A.
7-636-3
Janvier M.
Barranco Cosano J.[3]
6-47-5
Kuhn N.[6]
Hemery C.
6-46-1
Michalski D.
Krstin P.
6-46-0
Thompson J.[1]
Bertola R.
6-16-4
Carballes Baena R.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-756-06-1
Misolic F.
Miedler L.
6-23-66-1
Esteve Lobato E.
Echargui M.
6-17-5
Geerts M.
Ouakaa A.
2-66-46-1
Sels J.[5]
Jaziri M.
4-66-26-1
Ferreira Silva F.[4]
Mansouri S.
6-46-2
Sanchez Jover C.
Damas M.
6-46-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Vatutin A.
6-32-67-5