Angelique Kerber vs Kaja Juvan — Strasbourg Final

Strasbourg · WTA · Final
GER2
Angelique Kerber
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1685Clay ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
Kerber A.
7-6 6-7 7-6
Juvan K.
Kerber A.
7760772
Juvan K.
6577651

Angelique Kerber defeated Kaja Juvan 7-6 6-7 7-6 in the Strasbourg final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kaja Juvan came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Angelique Kerber claimed a first win over Kaja Juvan in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR128clayKaja Juvan6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kerber A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Juvan K.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kerber A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kerber A.Juvan K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Even
43%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 167). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kerber A.Juvan K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
58
Break points saved·Dominant
91
56
Break points won·Even
95
95
Deciding sets·Even
86
83
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kerber A.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Juvan K.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
2.3
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
8.1
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kerber A.[2]
Juvan K.
7-656-707-65
Semi-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Dodin O.
7-621-0
Juvan K.
Pliskova K.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Linette M.[8]
6-24-66-4
Dodin O.
Golubic V.[9]
6-36-0
Juvan K.
Mertens E.[4]
7-636-4
Pliskova K.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-47-66
R16
Golubic V.[9]
Ferro F.
6-46-2
Dodin O.
Makarova E.
6-26-1
Linette M.[8]
Watson H.
6-16-1
Mertens E.[4]
Friedsam A.
7-57-5
Pliskova K.[1]
Pera B.
6-31-66-1
Juvan K.
Berberovic N.
6-26-3
Zanevska M.
Tan H.
4-67-56-1
Kerber A.[2]
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-4
R32
Juvan K.
Glushko L.
6-36-1
Zanevska M.
Zhang S.[5]
6-26-3
Pliskova K.[1]
Kostyuk M.
6-46-2
Makarova E.
Cirstea S.[3]
1-66-36-2
Dodin O.
Konjuh A.
6-21-67-5
Pera B.
Ruse E.
7-56-4
Friedsam A.
Saville D.
4-66-37-65
Golubic V.[9]
Morderger Y.
6-06-4
Ferro F.
Gabueva A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[4]
Monnet C.
7-56-4
Linette M.[8]
Gracheva V.
6-36-0
Watson H.
Hobgarski K.
6-46-1
Tan H.
Stosur S.
6-26-1
Berberovic N.
Stephens S.[6]
2-66-46-1
Sasnovich A.
Gervais J.
6-46-2
Kerber A.[2]
Parry D.
6-36-4