Sergey Fomin vs Emilio Nava — Shymkent 2 CH Semi-final

Shymkent 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Sergey Fomin
UZB
Sergey Fomin
#297ATP
1422ELO
1414Clay ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Fomin S.
6-4 5-7 7-6
Nava E.
Fomin S.
65772
Nava E.
47651

Sergey Fomin defeated Emilio Nava 6-4 5-7 7-6 in the Shymkent 2 CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fomin S.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fomin S.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Fomin S.Nava E.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fomin S.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.2
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fomin S.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
52
Break points saved·Dominant
20
94
Break points won·Slight edge
24
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
89
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
28
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fomin S.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Nava E.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Clay Elo 1414
Surface ELO
7.1+272 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1422
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
9.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
9.07-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fomin S.Nava E.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
100

Fomin S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Fomin S.
Haase R.
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Fomin S.
Nava E.
6-45-77-65
Haase R.
Zhu E.
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Zhu E.
Marchenko I.[2]
6-37-62
Nava E.
Karlovskiy E.[5]
7-56-3
Haase R.
Ionel N.
3-67-56-2
Fomin S.
Uchida K.[4]
5-76-36-4
R16
Zhu E.
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Ionel N.
Alvarez Varona N.[3]
6-24-66-2
Haase R.
Jianu F.[6]
6-33-66-3
Fomin S.
Fanselow S.
6-36-3
Uchida K.[4]
Yevseyev D.
7-653-66-4
Karlovskiy E.[5]
Gakhov I.
7-657-5
Nava E.
Shevchenko A.[1]
6-36-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Decamps G.
6-16-1
R32
Haase R.
Tiurnev E.
7-633-1
Zhukayev B.
Mukund S.
6-17-611
Zhu E.
Bellier A.[8]
6-36-4
Alvarez Varona N.[3]
Madaras D.
6-46-0
Ionel N.
Kirkin E.
6-20-66-4
Fanselow S.
Istomin D.[7]
6-16-4
Yevseyev D.
Blanch U.
6-36-2
Nava E.
Oliel Y.
6-46-2
Decamps G.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[2]
Purtseladze S.
6-46-2
Uchida K.[4]
Vanshelboim E.
7-57-63
Shevchenko A.[1]
Lavagno E.
6-46-2
Fomin S.
Kachmazov A.
6-17-63
Gakhov I.
Durasovic V.
6-33-66-3
Karlovskiy E.[5]
Kadhe A.
6-44-66-1
Jianu F.[6]
Tashbulatov D.
6-26-2