Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Kristina Mladenovic — Rabat Round of 16

Rabat · WTA · Round of 16
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
ESP3
Nuria Parrizas Diaz
#626WTA
1398ELO
1395Clay ELO
34 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Kristina Mladenovic
FRA
Kristina Mladenovic
#841WTA
1422ELO
1371Clay ELO
33 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
Parrizas Diaz N.
4-6 6-3 6-0
Mladenovic K.
Parrizas Diaz N.
4662
Mladenovic K.
6301

Nuria Parrizas Diaz defeated Kristina Mladenovic 4-6 6-3 6-0 in the Rabat round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Parrizas Diaz N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Mladenovic K.

Mladenovic K.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Parrizas Diaz N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Parrizas Diaz N.Mladenovic K.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
59%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
37%
Service points won·Even
55%
52%
Return points won·Even
44%
43%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
1.1
1.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
7.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 85). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Parrizas Diaz N.Mladenovic K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
35
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
36
26
Break points won·Slight edge
79
69
Deciding sets·Clear edge
64
48
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Parrizas Diaz N.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Mladenovic K.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 66%

Draw

Final
Trevisan M.
Liu C.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Liu C.
Bondar A.[5]
W/O
Trevisan M.
Bronzetti L.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bondar A.[5]
Tomljanovic A.[2]
5-1
Bronzetti L.
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
6-13-67-65
Liu C.
Sharma A.
6-46-1
Trevisan M.
Rus A.[7]
7-646-3
R16
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Schmiedlova A.
7-56-2
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Mladenovic K.
4-66-36-0
Rus A.[7]
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Marcinko P.
5-76-36-3
Liu C.
Sherif M.[4]
4-67-656-1
Trevisan M.
Muguruza G.[1]
2-66-46-1
Bronzetti L.
Burel C.
6-36-2
Bondar A.[5]
Kucova K.
6-36-3
R32
Mladenovic K.
Andrianjafitrimo T.
6-33-67-67
Kucova K.
Harrison C.
6-26-0
Marcinko P.
Peterson R.[9]
6-02-67-5
Burel C.
Udvardy P.
7-647-63
Sharma A.
Zacarias M.
1-67-56-4
Muguruza G.[1]
Danilina A.
6-36-2
Schmiedlova A.
Reyngold E.
6-16-2
Rus A.[7]
Sun L.
6-36-0
Bronzetti L.
Kalinskaya A.[8]
6-36-756-3
Liu C.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-3
Trevisan M.
You X.
6-06-4
Galfi D.
Eikeri U.
6-27-5
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Zhao C.
7-641-66-2
Sherif M.[4]
Paquet C.
6-06-2
Bondar A.[5]
Ferrando C.
6-43-67-5
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1