Claire Liu vs Anna Bondar — Rabat Semi-final

Rabat · WTA · Semi-final
Claire Liu
USA
Claire Liu
#111WTA
1669ELO
1623Clay ELO
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWWW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
Anna Bondar
HUN5
Anna Bondar
#73WTA
1735ELO
1734Clay ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWLLWW
Liu C.
vs
Bondar A.

Claire Liu advanced past Anna Bondar via walkover in the Rabat semi-final. Claire Liu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-10-20GuangzhouR16hardClaire Liu6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Liu C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Bondar A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Liu C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Liu C.Bondar A.
—
Serve
54
—
Return
22

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Liu C.Bondar A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Liu C.Bondar A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
64
88
Break points won·Even
78
77
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
27
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
67
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Liu C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Bondar A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.1Clay Elo 1623
Surface ELO
7.9+111 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1669
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1735
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Liu C.Bondar A.
Freshness·Clear edge
71
86

Liu C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d) · Bondar A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
22°CClear
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 66%

Draw

Final
Trevisan M.
Liu C.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Liu C.
Bondar A.[5]
W/O
Trevisan M.
Bronzetti L.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Bondar A.[5]
Tomljanovic A.[2]
5-1
Bronzetti L.
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
6-13-67-65
Liu C.
Sharma A.
6-46-1
Trevisan M.
Rus A.[7]
7-646-3
R16
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Schmiedlova A.
7-56-2
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Mladenovic K.
4-66-36-0
Rus A.[7]
Galfi D.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Marcinko P.
5-76-36-3
Liu C.
Sherif M.[4]
4-67-656-1
Trevisan M.
Muguruza G.[1]
2-66-46-1
Bronzetti L.
Burel C.
6-36-2
Bondar A.[5]
Kucova K.
6-36-3
R32
Mladenovic K.
Andrianjafitrimo T.
6-33-67-67
Kucova K.
Harrison C.
6-26-0
Marcinko P.
Peterson R.[9]
6-02-67-5
Burel C.
Udvardy P.
7-647-63
Sharma A.
Zacarias M.
1-67-56-4
Muguruza G.[1]
Danilina A.
6-36-2
Schmiedlova A.
Reyngold E.
6-16-2
Rus A.[7]
Sun L.
6-36-0
Bronzetti L.
Kalinskaya A.[8]
6-36-756-3
Liu C.
Rakhimova K.
6-46-3
Trevisan M.
You X.
6-06-4
Galfi D.
Eikeri U.
6-27-5
Parrizas Diaz N.[3]
Zhao C.
7-641-66-2
Sherif M.[4]
Paquet C.
6-06-2
Bondar A.[5]
Ferrando C.
6-43-67-5
Tomljanovic A.[2]
Burillo Escorihuela I.
6-26-1