Kaja Juvan vs Nefisa Berberovic — Strasbourg Round of 16

Strasbourg · WTA · Round of 16
Kaja Juvan
SLO
Kaja Juvan
#140WTA
1696ELO
1685Clay ELO
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 May 2022
clay
BIH
Nefisa Berberovic
27 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLLLLLW
Juvan K.
6-2 6-3
Berberovic N.
Juvan K.
662
Berberovic N.
230

Kaja Juvan defeated Nefisa Berberovic 6-2 6-3 in the Strasbourg round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Juvan K.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Berberovic N.

Berberovic N.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Juvan K.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Juvan K.Berberovic N.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
49%
33%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Juvan K.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Berberovic N.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1192 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kerber A.[2]
Juvan K.
7-656-707-65
Semi-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Dodin O.
7-621-0
Juvan K.
Pliskova K.[1]
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Kerber A.[2]
Linette M.[8]
6-24-66-4
Dodin O.
Golubic V.[9]
6-36-0
Juvan K.
Mertens E.[4]
7-636-4
Pliskova K.[1]
Zanevska M.
6-47-66
R16
Golubic V.[9]
Ferro F.
6-46-2
Dodin O.
Makarova E.
6-26-1
Linette M.[8]
Watson H.
6-16-1
Mertens E.[4]
Friedsam A.
7-57-5
Pliskova K.[1]
Pera B.
6-31-66-1
Juvan K.
Berberovic N.
6-26-3
Zanevska M.
Tan H.
4-67-56-1
Kerber A.[2]
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-4
R32
Juvan K.
Glushko L.
6-36-1
Zanevska M.
Zhang S.[5]
6-26-3
Pliskova K.[1]
Kostyuk M.
6-46-2
Makarova E.
Cirstea S.[3]
1-66-36-2
Dodin O.
Konjuh A.
6-21-67-5
Pera B.
Ruse E.
7-56-4
Friedsam A.
Saville D.
4-66-37-65
Golubic V.[9]
Morderger Y.
6-06-4
Ferro F.
Gabueva A.
6-36-4
Mertens E.[4]
Monnet C.
7-56-4
Linette M.[8]
Gracheva V.
6-36-0
Watson H.
Hobgarski K.
6-46-1
Tan H.
Stosur S.
6-26-1
Berberovic N.
Stephens S.[6]
2-66-46-1
Sasnovich A.
Gervais J.
6-46-2
Kerber A.[2]
Parry D.
6-36-4