Naoki Nakagawa vs Sebastian Santibanez — Coquimbo CH Qualifying Round 1

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
JPN2
Naoki Nakagawa
#776ATP
1289ELO
1149Clay ELO
29 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
CHI
Sebastian Santibanez
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLL
Nakagawa N.
6-0 6-3
Santibanez S.
Nakagawa N.
662
Santibanez S.
030

Naoki Nakagawa defeated Sebastian Santibanez 6-0 6-3 in the Coquimbo CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nakagawa N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Santibanez S.

Santibanez S.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Nakagawa N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nakagawa N.Santibanez S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
65%
1st serve points won·Dominant
71%
46%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
50%
28%
Service points won·Clear edge
62%
40%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Dominant
61%
33%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
0.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.6
6.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (122 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nakagawa N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Santibanez S.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 210 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Nunez V.
6-23-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Panta Herreros J.[8]
6-26-3
Leite W.[5]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-3
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Otegui J.[12]
4-66-47-5
Nakagawa N.[2]
Galarza J.[11]
7-656-3
Dellien Velasco M.[1]
Martinez M.[10]
6-36-756-3
Rincon D.[2]
Galarza J.[10]
6-746-06-1
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Gagliardo L.[12]
2-66-06-3
Bertola R.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.[9]
6-06-0
Tenti F.[6]
Cigarran T.
6-14-66-2
Nagal S.[8]
Martinez M.[5]
6-16-2
Paul J.[4]
Carou I.[7]
6-16-2
Q1
Nakagawa N.[2]
Santibanez S.
6-06-3
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Achondo G.
6-06-1
Martinez M.[10]
Castro C.
6-26-1
Ribeiro E.
Carou I.[7]
6-46-3
Nunez V.
Lipovsek Puches T.[6]
2-66-46-1
Leite W.[5]
Loureiro J.
6-16-4
Panta Herreros J.[8]
Franco T.
6-26-766-2
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Merino A.
6-46-1
Otegui J.[12]
Hernandez F.
6-26-0
Galarza J.[11]
Nunez D.
7-646-2
Cigarran T.
Nunez D.[11]
7-647-5
Martinez M.[5]
Salazar A.
6-06-0
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Pereira M.
5-76-16-1
Gagliardo L.[12]
Nunez V.
4-66-44-1
Tenti F.[6]
Matuszewski P.
6-46-2
Nagal S.[8]
Drzewiecki K.
6-36-2
Paul J.[4]
Franco T.
6-36-2
Galarza J.[10]
Merino A.
6-26-2
Rincon D.[2]
Villalon N.
6-46-2