Filip Misolic vs Juncheng Shang — Zagreb CH Round of 16

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1640Clay ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Misolic F.
6-2 6-0
Shang J.
Misolic F.
662
Shang J.
200

Filip Misolic defeated Juncheng Shang 6-2 6-0 in the Zagreb CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Shang J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Even
79
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
96
Break points won·Slight edge
53
45
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
97
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Shang J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+24 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Clay Elo 1640
3.0Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Poljicak M.
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Poljicak M.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Misolic F.
Kubler J.[6]
7-53-66-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Serdarusic N.
6-06-4
Misolic F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-2
Kubler J.[6]
Wu Y.
7-686-2
R16
Basic M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-65
Poljicak M.
Gaio F.[8]
6-37-5
Gimeno Valero C.
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Serdarusic N.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.
Muller A.
7-656-3
Misolic F.
Shang J.
6-26-0
Wu Y.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Kubler J.[6]
Kicker N.
6-26-2
R32
Kopriva V.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-41-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Vukic A.[2]
6-16-1
Basic M.
Ivanovski K.
6-16-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Oconnell C.[3]
1-66-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Prizmic D.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Ficovich J.[7]
4-66-36-2
Misolic F.
Lacko L.
6-46-1
Kubler J.[6]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-2
Kicker N.
Marterer M.
4-66-36-1
Wu Y.
Thompson J.[1]
1-67-656-2
Poljicak M.
Zhang Z.
7-57-66
Fatic N.
Masur D.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Gaio F.[8]
Neuchrist M.
7-626-736-4
Shang J.
Horansky F.
7-653-67-5
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
5-76-13-0