Andrej Martin vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Heilbronn CH Quarter-final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SVK8
Andrej Martin
#392ATP
1470ELO
1444Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP4
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Martin A.
7-5 6-2
Zapata Miralles B.
Martin A.
762
Zapata Miralles B.
520

Andrej Martin defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 7-5 6-2 in the Heilbronn CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrej Martin closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (90 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martin A.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
12
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
54
74
Break points won·Dominant
25
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
56
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
9
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Zapata Miralles B.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.4+37 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.6Clay Elo 1407
5.7Overall Elo 1470
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
7.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.6
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[1]
Martin A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Galan D.[3]
6-32-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Forejtek J.
2-67-640-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
7-56-2
Galan D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-3
R16
Ritschard A.
Zekic M.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Martin A.[8]
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Tirante T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Forejtek J.
Bagnis F.[2]
7-682-66-3
Galan D.[3]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-2
R32
Galan D.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Hassan B.
Stricker D.
7-642-0
Forejtek J.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-757-64
Ritschard A.
Albot R.[6]
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Copil M.
6-756-46-4
Molleker R.
Kuhn N.
6-44-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Tseng C.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Bergs Z.
7-644-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Huesler M.[7]
3-66-37-67
Altmaier D.[1]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Rehberg M.
3-66-46-4
Lestienne C.
Cachin P.
6-31-66-1
Bagnis F.[2]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Krutykh O.
Simon G.
6-26-1
Zekic M.
Nagal S.
3-65-1