Filip Misolic vs Lukas Lacko — Zagreb CH Round of 32

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Misolic F.
6-4 6-1
Lacko L.
Misolic F.
662
Lacko L.
410

Filip Misolic defeated Lukas Lacko 6-4 6-1 in the Zagreb CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Serve advantage — Misolic F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
86
Break points won·Dominant
53
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lacko L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
0.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Poljicak M.
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Poljicak M.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Misolic F.
Kubler J.[6]
7-53-66-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Serdarusic N.
6-06-4
Misolic F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-2
Kubler J.[6]
Wu Y.
7-686-2
R16
Basic M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-65
Poljicak M.
Gaio F.[8]
6-37-5
Gimeno Valero C.
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Serdarusic N.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.
Muller A.
7-656-3
Misolic F.
Shang J.
6-26-0
Wu Y.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Kubler J.[6]
Kicker N.
6-26-2
R32
Kopriva V.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-41-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Vukic A.[2]
6-16-1
Basic M.
Ivanovski K.
6-16-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Oconnell C.[3]
1-66-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Prizmic D.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Ficovich J.[7]
4-66-36-2
Misolic F.
Lacko L.
6-46-1
Kubler J.[6]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-2
Kicker N.
Marterer M.
4-66-36-1
Wu Y.
Thompson J.[1]
1-67-656-2
Poljicak M.
Zhang Z.
7-57-66
Fatic N.
Masur D.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Gaio F.[8]
Neuchrist M.
7-626-736-4
Shang J.
Horansky F.
7-653-67-5
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
5-76-13-0