Filip Misolic vs Jason Kubler — Zagreb CH Semi-final

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
AUS6
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1616Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
Misolic F.
7-5 3-6 6-3
Kubler J.
Misolic F.
7362
Kubler J.
5631

Filip Misolic defeated Jason Kubler 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the Zagreb CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Kubler J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Serve advantage — Kubler J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Kubler J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
6.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Kubler J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
79
59
Break points saved·Even
91
90
Break points won·Slight edge
53
46
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kubler J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.6+48 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.4Clay Elo 1616
3.8Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1685
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Minutes 14d
8.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Poljicak M.
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Poljicak M.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Misolic F.
Kubler J.[6]
7-53-66-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Serdarusic N.
6-06-4
Misolic F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-2
Kubler J.[6]
Wu Y.
7-686-2
R16
Basic M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-65
Poljicak M.
Gaio F.[8]
6-37-5
Gimeno Valero C.
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Serdarusic N.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.
Muller A.
7-656-3
Misolic F.
Shang J.
6-26-0
Wu Y.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Kubler J.[6]
Kicker N.
6-26-2
R32
Kopriva V.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-41-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Vukic A.[2]
6-16-1
Basic M.
Ivanovski K.
6-16-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Oconnell C.[3]
1-66-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Prizmic D.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Ficovich J.[7]
4-66-36-2
Misolic F.
Lacko L.
6-46-1
Kubler J.[6]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-2
Kicker N.
Marterer M.
4-66-36-1
Wu Y.
Thompson J.[1]
1-67-656-2
Poljicak M.
Zhang Z.
7-57-66
Fatic N.
Masur D.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Gaio F.[8]
Neuchrist M.
7-626-736-4
Shang J.
Horansky F.
7-653-67-5
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
5-76-13-0