Coco Gauff vs Angelique Kerber — Rome Round of 64

Rome · WTA · Round of 64
Coco Gauff
USA15
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
GER
Angelique Kerber
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
Gauff C.
6-1 6-4
Kerber A.
Gauff C.
662
Kerber A.
140

Coco Gauff defeated Angelique Kerber 6-1 6-4 in the Rome round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Angelique Kerber came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Coco Gauff claimed a first win over Angelique Kerber in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-06-28WimbledonR16grassAngelique Kerber6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kerber A.

Kerber A.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Kerber A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Kerber A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
99
87
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
91
Break points won·Slight edge
100
95
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gauff C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kerber A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
2.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Kerber A.
Freshness·
60
—

Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[1]
Jabeur O.[9]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Sabalenka A.[3]
6-26-1
Jabeur O.[9]
Kasatkina D.
6-41-67-5
Quarter-finals
Kasatkina D.
Teichmann J.
6-43-2
Sabalenka A.[3]
Anisimova A.
4-66-36-2
Swiatek I.[1]
Andreescu B.
7-626-0
Jabeur O.[9]
Sakkari M.[4]
1-67-56-1
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Azarenka V.[16]
6-46-1
Sakkari M.[4]
Gauff C.[15]
6-47-5
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.
6-736-37-5
Kasatkina D.
Badosa P.[2]
6-46-4
Anisimova A.
Collins D.[7]
6-26-2
Jabeur O.[9]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-2
Andreescu B.
Martic P.
6-46-4
Sabalenka A.[3]
Pegula J.[13]
6-16-4
R32
Gauff C.[15]
Brengle M.
6-26-4
Badosa P.[2]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-1
Anisimova A.
Bencic B.[12]
7-656-1
Martic P.
Kontaveit A.[5]
6-26-3
Collins D.[7]
Halep S.
7-616-3
Putintseva Y.
Muguruza G.[8]
3-67-646-1
Sakkari M.[4]
Alexandrova E.
6-36-2
Rybakina E.
Davis L.
6-46-3
Pegula J.[13]
Kalinina A.
W/O
Kasatkina D.
Fernandez L.
4-66-37-62
Swiatek I.[1]
Ruse E.
6-36-0
Jabeur O.[9]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sabalenka A.[3]
Zhang S.
6-26-0
Teichmann J.
Pliskova K.[6]
6-24-66-4
Andreescu B.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-37-64
Azarenka V.[16]
Osorio C.
6-26-4
R64
Kalinina A.
Keys M.
6-46-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sorribes Tormo S.
1-63-4
Anisimova A.
Martincova T.
6-20-66-4
Jabeur O.[9]
Cirstea S.
6-07-61
Gauff C.[15]
Kerber A.
6-16-4
Teichmann J.
Paolini J.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Ostapenko J.[11]
6-26-3
Kasatkina D.
Zidansek T.
6-46-3
Sasnovich A.
Kudermetova V.
3-67-646-1
Andreescu B.
Raducanu E.[10]
6-22-1
Tomljanovic A.
Giorgi C.
6-34-2
Osorio C.
Bronzetti L.
7-646-3
Azarenka V.[16]
Golubic V.
6-36-0
Zhang S.
Trevisan M.
6-46-2
Pegula J.[13]
Samsonova L.
4-66-36-4
Bencic B.[12]
Cocciaretto E.
6-46-2
Ruse E.
Rogers S.
3-66-16-4
Martic P.
Muchova K.
6-23-66-1
Halep S.
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Rybakina E.
Avanesyan E.
6-47-60
Fernandez L.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[14]
1-66-26-2
Alexandrova E.
Stephens S.
6-16-2
Brengle M.
Kostyuk M.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.
Juvan K.
7-54-67-5