Daniel Elahi Galan vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Heilbronn CH Quarter-final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE5
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Galan D.
5-7 6-3 6-4
Tseng C.
Galan D.
5662
Tseng C.
7341

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 5-7 6-3 6-4 in the Heilbronn CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.3
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
48
26
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
83
Break points won·Slight edge
21
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
55
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Tseng C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1492
Surface ELO
5.5+49 Clay Elo edge
5.0Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1554
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
7.3
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[1]
Martin A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Galan D.[3]
6-32-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Forejtek J.
2-67-640-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
7-56-2
Galan D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-3
R16
Ritschard A.
Zekic M.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Martin A.[8]
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Tirante T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Forejtek J.
Bagnis F.[2]
7-682-66-3
Galan D.[3]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-2
R32
Galan D.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Hassan B.
Stricker D.
7-642-0
Forejtek J.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-757-64
Ritschard A.
Albot R.[6]
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Copil M.
6-756-46-4
Molleker R.
Kuhn N.
6-44-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Tseng C.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Bergs Z.
7-644-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Huesler M.[7]
3-66-37-67
Altmaier D.[1]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Rehberg M.
3-66-46-4
Lestienne C.
Cachin P.
6-31-66-1
Bagnis F.[2]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Krutykh O.
Simon G.
6-26-1
Zekic M.
Nagal S.
3-65-1