Jonas Forejtek vs Bjorn Fratangelo — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1364Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
USA
Bjorn Fratangelo
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Forejtek J.
6-1 6-7 7-6
Fratangelo B.
Forejtek J.
665772
Fratangelo B.
177641

Jonas Forejtek defeated Bjorn Fratangelo 6-1 6-7 7-6 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jonas Forejtek came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fratangelo B.

Fratangelo B.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Fratangelo B.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 45). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Fratangelo B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
88
Break points won·Slight edge
6
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fratangelo B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
6.3
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[1]
Martin A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Galan D.[3]
6-32-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Forejtek J.
2-67-640-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
7-56-2
Galan D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-3
R16
Ritschard A.
Zekic M.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Martin A.[8]
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Tirante T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Forejtek J.
Bagnis F.[2]
7-682-66-3
Galan D.[3]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-2
R32
Galan D.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Hassan B.
Stricker D.
7-642-0
Forejtek J.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-757-64
Ritschard A.
Albot R.[6]
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Copil M.
6-756-46-4
Molleker R.
Kuhn N.
6-44-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Tseng C.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Bergs Z.
7-644-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Huesler M.[7]
3-66-37-67
Altmaier D.[1]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Rehberg M.
3-66-46-4
Lestienne C.
Cachin P.
6-31-66-1
Bagnis F.[2]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Krutykh O.
Simon G.
6-26-1
Zekic M.
Nagal S.
3-65-1