Carlos Gimeno Valero vs Nerman Fatic — Zagreb CH Round of 16

Zagreb CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP
Carlos Gimeno Valero
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Gimeno Valero C.
6-3 6-1
Fatic N.
Gimeno Valero C.
662
Fatic N.
310

Carlos Gimeno Valero defeated Nerman Fatic 6-3 6-1 in the Zagreb CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gimeno Valero C.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Gimeno Valero C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gimeno Valero C.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
71%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
42%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
45%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.6
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (36 vs 188). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gimeno Valero C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fatic N.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.4
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.
Poljicak M.
6-37-66
Semi-finals
Poljicak M.
Gimeno Valero C.
6-46-1
Misolic F.
Kubler J.[6]
7-53-66-3
Quarter-finals
Poljicak M.
Basic M.
6-46-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Serdarusic N.
6-06-4
Misolic F.
Ajdukovic D.
7-56-2
Kubler J.[6]
Wu Y.
7-686-2
R16
Basic M.
Kuznetsov A.
6-47-65
Poljicak M.
Gaio F.[8]
6-37-5
Gimeno Valero C.
Fatic N.
6-36-1
Serdarusic N.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-36-4
Ajdukovic D.
Muller A.
7-656-3
Misolic F.
Shang J.
6-26-0
Wu Y.
Bonadio R.
6-37-5
Kubler J.[6]
Kicker N.
6-26-2
R32
Kopriva V.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-41-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Vukic A.[2]
6-16-1
Basic M.
Ivanovski K.
6-16-1
Gimeno Valero C.
Oconnell C.[3]
1-66-46-3
Serdarusic N.
Prizmic D.
6-46-2
Muller A.
Ficovich J.[7]
4-66-36-2
Misolic F.
Lacko L.
6-46-1
Kubler J.[6]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-16-2
Kicker N.
Marterer M.
4-66-36-1
Wu Y.
Thompson J.[1]
1-67-656-2
Poljicak M.
Zhang Z.
7-57-66
Fatic N.
Masur D.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.
Lamasine T.
6-46-3
Gaio F.[8]
Neuchrist M.
7-626-736-4
Shang J.
Horansky F.
7-653-67-5
Bonadio R.
Marozsan F.
5-76-13-0