Sebastian Fanselow vs Filip Cristian Jianu — Shymkent 1 CH Round of 32

Shymkent 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Filip Cristian Jianu
ROU8
Filip Cristian Jianu
#282ATP
1387ELO
1362Clay ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Fanselow S.
6-3 7-5
Jianu F.
Fanselow S.
672
Jianu F.
350

Sebastian Fanselow defeated Filip Cristian Jianu 6-3 7-5 in the Shymkent 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fanselow S.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Jianu F.

Jianu F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fanselow S.Jianu F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 192). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fanselow S.Jianu F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
4
16
Break points saved·Clear edge
31
55
Break points won·Dominant
5
52
Deciding sets·Slight edge
22
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fanselow S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jianu F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.9
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nava E.
Fanselow S.
6-47-63
Semi-finals
Fanselow S.
Kirkin E.
7-646-4
Nava E.
Blanch U.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Kirkin E.
Karlovskiy E.[7]
6-34-66-3
Nava E.
Durasovic V.
6-16-2
Fanselow S.
Madaras D.
6-47-65
Blanch U.
Lazarov A.
4-2
R16
Lazarov A.
Shevchenko A.[3]
3-66-47-63
Madaras D.
Ionel N.
6-46-3
Blanch U.
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
7-56-727-63
Durasovic V.
Torpegaard M.
6-47-62
Karlovskiy E.[7]
Yevseyev D.
3-66-36-2
Kirkin E.
Marchenko I.[4]
5-76-16-3
Nava E.
Zhu E.
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Bellier A.
3-66-16-2
R32
Marchenko I.[4]
Decamps G.
6-36-1
Ionel N.
Lomakin G.
6-06-2
Bellier A.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-767-66
Fanselow S.
Jianu F.[8]
6-37-5
Alvarez Varona N.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Lazarov A.
Bondarevskiy Y.
4-67-657-5
Torpegaard M.
Uchida K.[6]
6-34-66-3
Zhu E.
Istomin D.
6-13-66-1
Blanch U.
Oliel Y.
7-57-65
Yevseyev D.
Mukund S.
7-56-2
Nava E.
Sandgren T.[1]
6-36-4
Kirkin E.
Haase R.
5-76-47-62
Madaras D.
Celikbilek A.[2]
6-34-66-4
Shevchenko A.[3]
Vanshelboim E.
6-16-1
Karlovskiy E.[7]
Donati M.
6-33-66-3
Durasovic V.
Zhukayev B.
6-46-2