Pedro Boscardin Dias vs Gustavo Heide — Coquimbo CH Round of 16

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BRA
Pedro Boscardin Dias
#260ATP
1481ELO
1460Clay ELO
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
BRA
Gustavo Heide
#136ATP
1695ELO
1679Clay ELO
$167kYTD
$609kCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Boscardin Dias P.
7-6 6-4
Heide G.
Boscardin Dias P.
7762
Heide G.
6140

Pedro Boscardin Dias defeated Gustavo Heide 7-6 6-4 in the Coquimbo CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Gustavo Heide came in ranked #136.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Boscardin Dias P.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Heide G.

Heide G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Boscardin Dias P.

Serve advantage — Heide G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Boscardin Dias P.Heide G.
1st serve in·Even
58%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.7
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 171). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Boscardin Dias P.Heide G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
51
Break points saved·Dominant
25
90
Break points won·Even
14
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Boscardin Dias P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Heide G.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1460
Surface ELO
6.7+219 Clay Elo edge
3.4Overall Elo 1481
ELO gap
6.6Overall Elo 1695
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
5.9
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Boscardin Dias P.Heide G.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
72

Boscardin Dias P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 15 games (7d) · Heide G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0