Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Marius Copil — Heilbronn CH Round of 32

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP4
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Zapata Miralles B.
6-7 6-4 6-4
Copil M.
Zapata Miralles B.
65662
Copil M.
77441

Bernabe Zapata Miralles defeated Marius Copil 6-7 6-4 6-4 in the Heilbronn CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Bernabe Zapata Miralles came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zapata Miralles B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Serve advantage — Copil M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zapata Miralles B.Copil M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
59%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
63%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.6
8.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 114). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zapata Miralles B.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
47
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
91
Break points won·Dominant
80
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
56
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zapata Miralles B.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Copil M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.5
Surface form
2.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[1]
Martin A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Galan D.[3]
6-32-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Forejtek J.
2-67-640-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
7-56-2
Galan D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-3
R16
Ritschard A.
Zekic M.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Martin A.[8]
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Tirante T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Forejtek J.
Bagnis F.[2]
7-682-66-3
Galan D.[3]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-2
R32
Galan D.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Hassan B.
Stricker D.
7-642-0
Forejtek J.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-757-64
Ritschard A.
Albot R.[6]
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Copil M.
6-756-46-4
Molleker R.
Kuhn N.
6-44-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Tseng C.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Bergs Z.
7-644-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Huesler M.[7]
3-66-37-67
Altmaier D.[1]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Rehberg M.
3-66-46-4
Lestienne C.
Cachin P.
6-31-66-1
Bagnis F.[2]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Krutykh O.
Simon G.
6-26-1
Zekic M.
Nagal S.
3-65-1