Francisco Comesana vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Coquimbo CH Round of 32

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Francisco Comesana
ARG
Francisco Comesana
#94ATP
1695ELO
1656Clay ELO
$580kYTD
$2.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Comesana F.
6-3 6-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Comesana F.
662
Dellien Velasco M.
330

Francisco Comesana defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-3 6-3 in the Coquimbo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Comesana F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Comesana F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Comesana F.Dellien Velasco M.
40
Serve
—
16
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Comesana F.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Comesana F.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
19
Break points saved·Dominant
90
28
Break points won·Clear edge
36
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
63
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
38
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Comesana F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Dellien Velasco M.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+288 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1368
8.3Overall Elo 1695
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1379
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.6
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
6.1
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Comesana F.Dellien Velasco M.
Freshness·
90
—

Comesana F.: 11 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0