Danielle Collins vs Simona Halep — Rome Round of 32
Rome · WTA · Round of 32
USA7#701WTA
1844ELO
1809Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Collins D.7-6 6-3
Halep S.
Collins D.
7762
Halep S.
6130
Danielle Collins defeated Simona Halep 7-6 6-3 in the Rome round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Simona Halep came in defending last year's round of 32. Danielle Collins extended the head-to-head to 2–1.
Key context
- Match story: Danielle Collins closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.
Head to head
1–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | Montreal | R32 | hard | Danielle Collins | 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
| 2014-08-25 | US Open | R128 | hard | Simona Halep | 6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Halep S.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
44%
48%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
2.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.0
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 53). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
88
89
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
87
Break points won·Even
99
100
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
98
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
82
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Umpiry Score
Pre-match7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0
H2H5.0
7.9
Surface form6.3
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d7.1
9.0
Prev. match9.0
Country comfort
6.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts6.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Kasatkina D.
Teichmann J.
6-43-2
Sabalenka A.[3]
Anisimova A.
4-66-36-2
Swiatek I.[1]
Andreescu B.
7-626-0
Jabeur O.[9]
Sakkari M.[4]
1-67-56-1
R16
Swiatek I.[1]
Azarenka V.[16]
6-46-1
Sakkari M.[4]
Gauff C.[15]
6-47-5
Teichmann J.
Rybakina E.
6-736-37-5
Kasatkina D.
Badosa P.[2]
6-46-4
Anisimova A.
Collins D.[7]
6-26-2
Jabeur O.[9]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-2
Andreescu B.
Martic P.
6-46-4
Sabalenka A.[3]
Pegula J.[13]
6-16-4
R32
Gauff C.[15]
Brengle M.
6-26-4
Badosa P.[2]
Sasnovich A.
6-26-1
Anisimova A.
Bencic B.[12]
7-656-1
Martic P.
Kontaveit A.[5]
6-26-3
Collins D.[7]
Halep S.
7-616-3
Putintseva Y.
Muguruza G.[8]
3-67-646-1
Sakkari M.[4]
Alexandrova E.
6-36-2
Rybakina E.
Davis L.
6-46-3
Pegula J.[13]
Kalinina A.
W/O
Kasatkina D.
Fernandez L.
4-66-37-62
Swiatek I.[1]
Ruse E.
6-36-0
Jabeur O.[9]
Tomljanovic A.
7-56-2
Sabalenka A.[3]
Zhang S.
6-26-0
Teichmann J.
Pliskova K.[6]
6-24-66-4
Andreescu B.
Parrizas Diaz N.
6-37-64
Azarenka V.[16]
Osorio C.
6-26-4
R64
Kalinina A.
Keys M.
6-46-4
Parrizas Diaz N.
Sorribes Tormo S.
1-63-4
Anisimova A.
Martincova T.
6-20-66-4
Jabeur O.[9]
Cirstea S.
6-07-61
Gauff C.[15]
Kerber A.
6-16-4
Teichmann J.
Paolini J.
6-36-2
Davis L.
Ostapenko J.[11]
6-26-3
Kasatkina D.
Zidansek T.
6-46-3
Sasnovich A.
Kudermetova V.
3-67-646-1
Andreescu B.
Raducanu E.[10]
6-22-1
Tomljanovic A.
Giorgi C.
6-34-2
Osorio C.
Bronzetti L.
7-646-3
Azarenka V.[16]
Golubic V.
6-36-0
Zhang S.
Trevisan M.
6-46-2
Pegula J.[13]
Samsonova L.
4-66-36-4
Bencic B.[12]
Cocciaretto E.
6-46-2
Ruse E.
Rogers S.
3-66-16-4
Martic P.
Muchova K.
6-23-66-1
Halep S.
Cornet A.
6-46-4
Rybakina E.
Avanesyan E.
6-47-60
Fernandez L.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[14]
1-66-26-2
Alexandrova E.
Stephens S.
6-16-2
Brengle M.
Kostyuk M.
6-46-3
Putintseva Y.
Juvan K.
7-54-67-5