Marin Cilic vs Cameron Norrie — Rome Masters Round of 32

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Marin Cilic
CRO
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1701Clay ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Cameron Norrie
GBR9
Cameron Norrie
#38ATP
1829ELO
1788Clay ELO
$963kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Cilic M.
5-7 6-2 6-1
Norrie C.
Cilic M.
5662
Norrie C.
7211

Marin Cilic defeated Cameron Norrie 5-7 6-2 6-1 in the Rome Masters round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Cameron Norrie came in ranked #38, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Marin Cilic claimed a first win over Cameron Norrie in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-26EstorilSFclayCameron Norrie7-6(5) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Norrie C.

Norrie C.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cilic M.Norrie C.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
38

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Norrie C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
67%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
5.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (137 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Norrie C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
89
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
41
83
Deciding sets·Even
94
98
Tiebreaks·Even
87
89

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Norrie C.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Clay Elo 1701
Surface ELO
6.5+87 Clay Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1829
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.9
Surface form
5.8
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
6.0
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Norrie C.
Freshness·Even
98
95

Cilic M.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Norrie C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
R32
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
R64
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2