Mateo Nicolas Martinez vs Cristobal Castro — Coquimbo CH Qualifying Round 1

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ITA10
Mateo Nicolas Martinez
32 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
CHI
Cristobal Castro
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Martinez M.
6-2 6-1
Castro C.
Martinez M.
662
Castro C.
210

Mateo Nicolas Martinez defeated Cristobal Castro 6-2 6-1 in the Coquimbo CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martinez M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Castro C.

Castro C.serving29% hold

wins 41% of points on serve vs Martinez M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martinez M.Castro C.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
58%
51%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
45%
32%
Service points won·Slight edge
53%
43%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
41%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.3
0.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martinez M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Castro C.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.8
Surface form
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Nunez V.
6-23-66-3
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Panta Herreros J.[8]
6-26-3
Leite W.[5]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-3
Reis Da Silva J.[3]
Otegui J.[12]
4-66-47-5
Nakagawa N.[2]
Galarza J.[11]
7-656-3
Dellien Velasco M.[1]
Martinez M.[10]
6-36-756-3
Rincon D.[2]
Galarza J.[10]
6-746-06-1
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Gagliardo L.[12]
2-66-06-3
Bertola R.[1]
Lipovsek Puches T.[9]
6-06-0
Tenti F.[6]
Cigarran T.
6-14-66-2
Nagal S.[8]
Martinez M.[5]
6-16-2
Paul J.[4]
Carou I.[7]
6-16-2
Q1
Nakagawa N.[2]
Santibanez S.
6-06-3
Huertas Del Pino A.[9]
Achondo G.
6-06-1
Martinez M.[10]
Castro C.
6-26-1
Ribeiro E.
Carou I.[7]
6-46-3
Nunez V.
Lipovsek Puches T.[6]
2-66-46-1
Leite W.[5]
Loureiro J.
6-16-4
Panta Herreros J.[8]
Franco T.
6-26-766-2
Huertas Del Pino C.[4]
Merino A.
6-46-1
Otegui J.[12]
Hernandez F.
6-26-0
Galarza J.[11]
Nunez D.
7-646-2
Cigarran T.
Nunez D.[11]
7-647-5
Martinez M.[5]
Salazar A.
6-06-0
Vidal Azorin J.[3]
Pereira M.
5-76-16-1
Gagliardo L.[12]
Nunez V.
4-66-44-1
Tenti F.[6]
Matuszewski P.
6-46-2
Nagal S.[8]
Drzewiecki K.
6-36-2
Paul J.[4]
Franco T.
6-36-2
Galarza J.[10]
Merino A.
6-26-2
Rincon D.[2]
Villalon N.
6-46-2