Hernan Casanova vs Nicolas Mejia — Coquimbo CH Round of 32

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Nicolas Mejia
COL
Nicolas Mejia
#133ATP
1477ELO
1488Clay ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
Casanova H.
6-7 6-1 6-4
Mejia N.
Casanova H.
61662
Mejia N.
77141

Hernan Casanova defeated Nicolas Mejia 6-7 6-1 6-4 in the Coquimbo CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #133.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Casanova H.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Mejia N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Casanova H.Mejia N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
76%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.5
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (155 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Casanova H.Mejia N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
8
26
Break points saved·Dominant
24
74
Break points won·Clear edge
22
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
32
40
Tiebreaks·Even
34
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Casanova H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mejia N.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1381
Surface ELO
6.9+107 Clay Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1477
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
4.2
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Casanova H.Mejia N.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
55

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d) · Mejia N.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 116 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.
Boscardin Dias P.
7-57-64
Cerundolo J.[7]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Boscardin Dias P.
Torres J.
7-636-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Comesana F.
6-16-4
Cerundolo J.[7]
Agamenone F.[8]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Skatov T.[6]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Torres J.
Collarini A.[3]
0-66-46-0
Comesana F.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-636-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Huertas Del Pino A.
1-66-46-4
Diaz Acosta F.
Barrios Vera T.[1]
6-46-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Collarini A.
4-67-56-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-36-3
Cerundolo J.[7]
Etcheverry T.[2]
4-66-36-4
Skatov T.[6]
Coria F.[1]
6-33-66-4
R16
Huertas Del Pino A.
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
7-656-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Heide G.
7-616-4
Collarini A.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-2
Torres J.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-34-66-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
7-616-0
Comesana F.
Olivieri G.[4]
6-36-4
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-46-1
Collarini A.
Nagal S.
6-26-1
Agamenone F.[8]
Paul J.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
6-36-1
Skatov T.[6]
Kicker N.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[1]
Navone M.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo J.[7]
Soto M.
6-16-4
Cecchinato M.[4]
Bertola R.
6-16-3
Etcheverry T.[2]
Vidal Azorin J.
6-36-1
R32
Lama G.[5]
Villanueva G.
6-44-66-2
Huertas Del Pino C.
Villalon N.
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Soares Klier Junior G.
6-26-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[2]
Franco Descotte M.
6-36-706-1
Boscardin Dias P.
Leite W.
6-36-0
Heide G.
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
6-47-64
Andreev A.
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-26-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Martin Tiffon P.
Rodriguez C.
7-56-4
Comesana F.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-36-3
Olivieri G.[4]
Nakagawa N.
6-26-3
Casanova H.
Mejia N.
6-716-16-4
Collarini A.[3]
Zukas M.
7-656-2
Barrios Vera T.[1]
Burruchaga R.
6-22-67-5
Huertas Del Pino A.
Alvarez N.
7-56-2
Torres J.
Luz O.[7]
6-37-65
Etcheverry T.[2]
Fernandez Flores D.
6-36-1
Vidal Azorin J.
Olivo R.
2-66-37-5
Soto M.
Paz J.
6-26-1
Nagal S.
Altmaier D.[3]
6-27-67
Collarini A.
Dutra Da Silva D.
1-66-27-5
Ugo Carabelli C.[5]
Olivieri G.
6-46-1
Diaz Acosta F.
Casanova H.
6-767-626-1
Bertola R.
Burruchaga R.
6-47-5
Skatov T.[6]
Rincon D.
7-56-2
Kicker N.
Comesana F.
6-16-3
Navone M.
Torres J.
3-66-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Giannessi A.
6-46-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-27-5
Cerundolo J.[7]
Villanueva G.
6-46-3
Paul J.
Vallejo A.
6-26-3
Agamenone F.[8]
Tenti F.
7-56-0