Marcos Giron vs Alexander Bublik — Rome Masters Round of 64

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Marcos Giron
USA
Marcos Giron
#87ATP
1718ELO
1604Clay ELO
$495kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Alexander Bublik
KAZ
Alexander Bublik
#11ATP
1889ELO
1822Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$12MCAREER
29 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLL
Giron M.
3-6 6-4 6-3
Bublik A.
Giron M.
3662
Bublik A.
6431

Marcos Giron defeated Alexander Bublik 3-6 6-4 6-3 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alexander Bublik came in ranked #11, defending last year's round of 64. Marcos Giron extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-05Hong KongSFhardAlexander Bublik3-6 6-4 6-2
2023-09-20ChengduR32hardMarcos Giron7-6(6) 6-3
2023-05-22GenevaR32clayMarcos Giron6-0 6-4
2021-08-16Cincinnati MastersR64hardAlexander Bublik3-6 6-3 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Giron M.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bublik A.

Bublik A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Giron M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Giron M.Bublik A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
51

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Giron M.Bublik A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.2
11.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.5
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giron M.Bublik A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
62
88
Break points saved·Even
98
99
Break points won·Dominant
42
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giron M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Bublik A.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.4Clay Elo 1604
Surface ELO
7.6+219 Clay Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1718
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1889
5.0
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Giron M.Bublik A.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
74

Giron M.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Bublik A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
R32
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
R64
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2