Jonas Forejtek vs Facundo Bagnis — Heilbronn CH Round of 16

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1364Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
ARG2
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Forejtek J.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Bagnis F.
Forejtek J.
710262
Bagnis F.
68631

Jonas Forejtek defeated Facundo Bagnis 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the Heilbronn CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Jonas Forejtek closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Forejtek J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Forejtek J.Bagnis F.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Forejtek J.Bagnis F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
54
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
92
Break points won·Dominant
6
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
89
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Forejtek J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bagnis F.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.9Clay Elo 1364
Surface ELO
7.1+220 Clay Elo edge
3.0Overall Elo 1387
ELO gap
7.0Overall Elo 1591
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
6.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
7.5
0.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[1]
Martin A.[8]
3-66-16-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Galan D.[3]
6-32-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Forejtek J.
2-67-640-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[8]
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
7-56-2
Galan D.[3]
Tseng C.[5]
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Tirante T.
6-36-2
Forejtek J.
Ritschard A.
5-76-36-3
R16
Ritschard A.
Zekic M.
6-16-1
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Martin A.[8]
Krutykh O.
6-36-4
Tseng C.[5]
Squire H.
6-16-2
Tirante T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Lestienne C.
6-16-4
Forejtek J.
Bagnis F.[2]
7-682-66-3
Galan D.[3]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-2
R32
Galan D.[3]
Sels J.
6-36-4
Hassan B.
Stricker D.
7-642-0
Forejtek J.
Fratangelo B.
6-16-757-64
Ritschard A.
Albot R.[6]
6-36-3
Zapata Miralles B.[4]
Copil M.
6-756-46-4
Molleker R.
Kuhn N.
6-44-66-4
Martin A.[8]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Tseng C.[5]
Escobedo E.
6-26-3
Squire H.
Bergs Z.
7-644-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Huesler M.[7]
3-66-37-67
Altmaier D.[1]
Mena F.
6-26-3
Tirante T.
Rehberg M.
3-66-46-4
Lestienne C.
Cachin P.
6-31-66-1
Bagnis F.[2]
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Krutykh O.
Simon G.
6-26-1
Zekic M.
Nagal S.
3-65-1