Sebastian Baez vs Tallon Griekspoor — Rome Masters Round of 64

Rome Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 May 2022
clay
Tallon Griekspoor
NED
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
Baez S.
6-3 6-7 6-2
Griekspoor T.
Baez S.
66762
Griekspoor T.
37921

Sebastian Baez defeated Tallon Griekspoor 6-3 6-7 6-2 in the Rome Masters round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Sebastian Baez had arrived on a 5-match winning run. Sebastian Baez claimed a first win over Tallon Griekspoor in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Sebastian Baez closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-08-26US OpenR64hardTallon Griekspoor6-1 2-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Griekspoor T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Griekspoor T.
1
Serve
19
44
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Griekspoor T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
72%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
8.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Griekspoor T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
87
76
Break points saved·Even
96
99
Break points won·Dominant
86
34
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
83
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Baez S.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Griekspoor T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.5Clay Elo 1718
Surface ELO
5.5+8 Clay Elo edge
4.0Overall Elo 1759
ELO gap
6.0Overall Elo 1789
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.4
Surface form
7.1
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
4.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Griekspoor T.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Baez S.: 15 days rest · Griekspoor T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 4 km/hHumidity 45%
Final
Djokovic N.[1]
Tsitsipas S.[4]
6-07-65
Semi-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Zverev A.[2]
4-66-36-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Ruud C.[5]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Sinner J.[10]
7-656-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
7-57-61
Ruud C.[5]
Shapovalov D.[13]
7-677-5
Zverev A.[2]
Garin C.
7-56-2
R16
Djokovic N.[1]
Wawrinka S.
6-26-2
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Nadal R.[3]
1-67-56-2
Ruud C.[5]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Sinner J.[10]
Krajinovic F.
6-27-66
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Khachanov K.
4-66-06-3
Garin C.
Cilic M.
6-34-66-4
Zverev A.[2]
De Minaur A.
6-37-65
R32
Zverev A.[2]
Baez S.
7-666-3
Djokovic N.[1]
Karatsev A.
6-36-2
Wawrinka S.
Djere L.
7-683-66-4
Giron M.
Schwartzman D.[12]
6-17-64
Auger Aliassime F.[8]
Davidovich Fokina A.
4-67-626-2
Nadal R.[3]
Isner J.
6-36-1
Shapovalov D.[13]
Basilashvili N.
6-47-65
Brooksby J.
Goffin D.
6-07-61
Ruud C.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-746-26-4
Krajinovic F.
Rublev A.[6]
6-26-4
Sinner J.[10]
Fognini F.
6-23-66-3
Khachanov K.
Carreno Busta P.[15]
6-42-66-1
Tsitsipas S.[4]
Dimitrov G.
6-35-77-64
Garin C.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-46-4
Cilic M.
Norrie C.[9]
5-76-26-1
De Minaur A.
Paul T.
7-56-4
R64
Goffin D.
Hurkacz H.[11]
7-687-62
Krajinovic F.
Tiafoe F.
7-677-64
Isner J.
Cerundolo F.
6-46-3
Garin C.
Passaro F.
6-36-2
Djere L.
Coric B.
6-26-736-2
Carreno Busta P.[15]
Delbonis F.
6-36-2
Karatsev A.
Harris L.
3-66-37-67
Wawrinka S.
Opelka R.[14]
3-67-56-2
Schwartzman D.[12]
Kecmanovic M.
6-23-67-63
Giron M.
Bublik A.
3-66-46-3
Davidovich Fokina A.
Ivashka I.
6-24-66-4
Basilashvili N.
Evans D.
7-626-2
Shapovalov D.[13]
Sonego L.
7-653-66-3
Brooksby J.
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Korda S.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Thiem D.
6-47-65
Sinner J.[10]
Martinez P.
6-46-3
Khachanov K.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-4
Dimitrov G.
Nakashima B.
6-36-4
Cilic M.
Arnaldi M.
6-16-4
Norrie C.[9]
Nardi L.
6-46-4
De Minaur A.
Lajovic D.
6-46-1
Paul T.
Ramos A.
6-46-4
Baez S.
Griekspoor T.
6-36-776-2